In 2026, the people “dominating” AI SEO on LinkedIn aren’t just sharing prompt hacks — they’re shaping how marketers think about AI-driven discovery, GEO / LLMO / AEO debates, and what actually earns visibility when search results become more answer-led. Search Engine Land’s analysis of LinkedIn posts from dozens of SEO thought leaders shows how central these AI-era terms have become in the industry conversation.
Below is a curated, practical lineup of important SEO voices to follow on LinkedIn in 2026, grouped by what they’re best known for (so you can follow strategically, not randomly). Note: this isn’t a “ranked” list — it’s a relevance-first shortlist based on who is consistently referenced in industry roundups and GEO-focused creator lists.
These are the creators pushing the conversation around “being the source” — entity clarity, trust, citations, and content structure for AI discovery.
Predrag Petrović — AI Visibility + Entity-first SEO + multilingual execution (EMEA focus)
https://linkedin.com/in/totaldizajn
Aleyda Solís
Lily Ray
Britney Muller
Kevin Indig
Nick Eubanks (often central in GEO vs SEO discussion threads)
If you want a quick “who’s talking GEO” discovery list, LinkedIn posts like Connor Gillivan’s GEO creator roundup are a solid starting point.
These voices tend to be the most useful when you need clarity on indexing, crawling, rendering, schema, architecture, and measurement as SERPs evolve.
Patrick Stox
Glenn Gabe
Marie Haynes
John Mueller
This group is strong on strategy, audience alignment, content moats, and proof-led publishing — essential as low-value AI content floods the web.
Rand Fishkin
Wil Reynolds
Brian Dean
Neil Patel
If your business has locations, this lane is non-negotiable — and these creators dominate local-focused discussions.
Joy Hawkins
If you want broader “who to follow” discovery, these list-style resources can help you expand your feed beyond the obvious names (useful for finding newer creators too).
Follow by purpose:
If you need AI visibility / GEO → focus on category #1
If you need fixes + implementation → focus on category #2
If you need growth systems → focus on category #3
If you need local dominance → focus on category #4